Executive Compensation and Investor Clientele
نویسندگان
چکیده
Executive Compensation and Investor Clientele Executive compensation has increased dramatically in recent times, but so has trading volume and individual investor access to financial markets. We provide a model where some managers may understate asset values through misleading statements in order to have enough of a cushion to compensate themselves. Owing to a lack of sophistication or näıveté, possibly arising from high opportunity costs of learning about accounting conventions and financial markets, small investors are unable to ascertain the extent of this behavior. Expected compensation is therefore higher when small investors form a more significant clientele in the market for a firm’s stock. Increased precision of private information deters the entry of small investors and may keep executive compensation in check. Technologies that lower the cost of trading facilitate entry of small investors and raise expected compensation. Such compensation can in general be reduced through appropriate regulation and transparent disclosures. Empirical tests provide support to the key implication of the model that indirect executive compensation is higher in stocks with more retail investor participation.
منابع مشابه
Why Do Managers Avoid EPS Dilution?
Survey and empirical evidence reveals that managers prefer to avoid earnings dilution, though financial theory suggests that it is irrelevant in firm valuation. We explore contracting and behavioral explanations for this apparent paradox. Using a large sample of debt/equity issuers, we report evidence that managers only avoid earnings dilution when their bonus compensation explicitly depends up...
متن کاملIndustry Effects on the Use of Board and Institutional Investor Monitoring and Executive Incentive Compensation
This paper develops and empirically tests a theory of the use of board and institutional investor monitoring and the use of executive incentive compensation under different types of uncertainty in the industry. This empirical examination is based on a sample of U.S. firms operating in a wide range of industries. Practical implications derived from this paper direct the attention of both shareho...
متن کاملCorporate Fraud and Business Conditions: Evidence from Ipos
We examine how a firm’s incentive to commit fraud when going public varies with investor beliefs about industry business conditions. Fraud propensity increases with the level of investor beliefs about industry prospects but decreases in the presence of extremely high beliefs. Evidence suggests that two mechanisms are at work: monitoring by investors, and short-term executive compensation, both ...
متن کاملSeminar in Law , Economics , and Organization
In this paper, I analyze how the influence of executives affects the compensation decisions of boards of directors. Boards vary in their degree of independence, and compensation decisions not only serve to motivate executives and allocate rents, but also affect a board’s reputation for independence. Although greater managerial influence over the board has the obvious effect of increasing the le...
متن کاملThe evolution of shareholder voting for executive compensation schemes
We examine shareholder voting on management-sponsored compensation proposals from 1992 through 2003 to determine how voting has evolved as a result of changes in the corporate governance environment. We investigate three questions: have regulatory changes and changes in investor sentiment affected voting; do the same factors appear to influence voting over time and has the impact of the various...
متن کامل